Outrage over University of Virginia President's Forced Resignation

Introduction
In a recent interview with Politico, Senator Mark Warner of Virginia expressed his outrage over the forced resignation of the University of Virginia's president, Teresa Sullivan. According to Senator Warner, the federal government should not interfere with the operations of the university and instead, should leave it up to the school's board of trustees.
Background
This controversy comes amidst a heated gubernatorial election in Virginia, where President Donald Trump's policies are looming over the race. While Trump's name is not on the ballot, his influence and policies are very much a factor in this election.
Previous Interference
This is not the first time that the federal government has meddled in the affairs of the University of Virginia. In 2012, Sullivan faced pressure from the board of visitors to resign, but she was ultimately reinstated after widespread protests from students, faculty, and alumni. The move was seen as an attempt by the board to push the university towards a more corporate model, which was met with fierce opposition.
The Government's Role
Senator Warner argues that the government should not dictate the operations of the university, as it goes against the principles of academic freedom and autonomy. He also noted that the University of Virginia is a public institution, receiving only a small percentage of its funding from the federal government, making their interference unwarranted.
The Importance of Academic Freedom
Academic freedom is a crucial element in higher education, allowing for open and diverse discourse and the pursuit of knowledge without fear of censorship or control. The government's involvement in the removal of the university's president goes against this fundamental principle and sets a dangerous precedent for other institutions.
Conclusion
The ousting of the University of Virginia's president, Teresa Sullivan, has sparked outrage from Senator Mark Warner and others who believe that the government should not interfere with the operations of the university. This controversy also highlights the importance of academic freedom in higher education and the potential consequences of government interference. As the Virginia gubernatorial election approaches, the outcome will undoubtedly have an impact on the future of the University of Virginia and its autonomy.